Match the report title.
Look for "More than one title defined in OPF metadata" or the closest title above. Keep the original EPUBCheck, KDP, or Kindle Previewer wording if it differs.
EPUB error guide
Use this when EPUBCheck or a publishing platform says the OPF metadata has more than one title. Check the metadata before changing KDP listing details.
Scan when the message does not name the affected path. The report shows affected paths and repair decisions, not manuscript text.
Fixed-layout, DRM, or source-workflow issue? Check unsupported or review-first EPUB cases.
Match these report titles
Use this guide when
Your message matches "More than one title defined in OPF metadata" or one of the report titles above.
Upload if
You have the exported reflowable .epub and need the affected path, file, field, or repair decision before editing.
Handle outside this tool
Use the source tool or publishing workflow for DOCX, PDF, KPF, KCB, fixed-layout, comics, image-first books, DRM, visual design, or KDP listing and approval problems.
Read the scan report
Use the report label, affected file, and repair decision together. A matching title alone is not enough if the file path or EPUB structure points to a different problem.
Look for "More than one title defined in OPF metadata" or the closest title above. Keep the original EPUBCheck, KDP, or Kindle Previewer wording if it differs.
Use the Affected area, Source file, Target file, or Problem type rows before editing OPF, nav, XHTML, CSS, or image paths.
Repairable means one clear structural change. Needs review or Not supported means use the named file, source project, or platform step.
Copy these fields from the report instead of rebuilding the fix from memory.
1. Example report output
The report should show the competing metadata values, not just say the title is wrong.
Validator message
E20006: There is more than one title defined in OPF metadata.
Affected file
OEBPS/content.opf.
EPUB Fixer report
dc:title appears twice: Final Book Title and Untitled Export.
Do this next
Keep one title only when the intended publication title is clear.
Do not do this
Do not let the scanner choose between real title variants or subtitle wording.
Safe repair means removing a duplicate or stale title only when the intended title is obvious.
2. Next step
Metadata can be easy to edit but risky when values conflict.
Scan first
Show each title value, id, and refinement before editing content.opf.
Safe repair
Remove or align the duplicate only when one title is obviously an export leftover.
Manual review
Return to the source project when title, subtitle, series, or edition wording needs a decision.
3. Concrete path example
A source tool can leave an old title next to the real publication title.
Validator: E20006: There is more than one title defined in OPF metadata. Report: dc:title #1: Final Book Title dc:title #2: Untitled Export Source file: OEBPS/content.opf Fix decision: safe only if Untitled Export is clearly stale After: keep one title, then validate again
If both titles could be intentional, choose the publication metadata manually.
Quick decision
The scanner can point to conflicting metadata, but the publication title is an author or publisher decision.
Scan first
List duplicate dc:title entries and any title refinements in content.opf.
Safe fix
Remove or align the stale title only when it is obviously leftover metadata.
Stop
Do not choose between title, subtitle, series, or edition values automatically.
Start here
This is an EPUB package metadata problem. KDP listing title fields do not fix duplicate title entries inside content.opf.
The EPUB package names the book title more than once, so validators cannot treat the metadata as a single clear title.
It can be repaired when one title is clearly stale, duplicated, or empty and the intended title is already obvious.
Open content.opf and list every dc:title entry.
It is unsafe when the title, subtitle, series, or edition wording needs author or publisher judgment.
Common situations
Duplicate title metadata often comes from repeated export or manual OPF editing.
The OPF contains a final title and a stale draft title.
Remove the stale value only when the intended title is clear.
Some tools split title and subtitle in a confusing way.
Review metadata manually before deleting.
Extra title-like fields may represent real publishing metadata.
Keep structure valid without guessing the cataloging choice.
Store metadata and EPUB package metadata are separate.
Fix OPF only when the EPUB package itself has duplicate title entries.
E20006: There is more than one title defined in OPF metadata.
EPUBCheck, Kindle Previewer, or a store validator finds more than one title value in the OPF metadata package.
What it means
The EPUB package names the book title more than once, so validators cannot treat the metadata as a single clear title.
Repeated exports, source-tool metadata fields, or manual OPF edits can leave duplicate dc:title entries.
Before you edit
A safe fix needs one publication title to be clear from the OPF or source project. Do not delete metadata blindly.
Why KDP checks it
The OPF file is the EPUB's map: metadata, file list, reading order, and navigation wiring. KDP and EPUBCheck use it to decide whether the book package is coherent.
EPUBCheck checks EPUB 2 and EPUB 3 files against the official rules and reports package, markup, link, and file-reference problems.
KDP supports EPUB files that meet Kindle Publishing Guidelines and recommends checking the file with Kindle Previewer before upload.
Can this be fixed safely?
It can be repaired when one title is clearly stale, duplicated, or empty and the intended title is already obvious.
It is unsafe when the title, subtitle, series, or edition wording needs author or publisher judgment.
Before: content.opf has two dc:title entries. After: only the intended title remains if that choice is clear.
Ready to retry?
Upload the EPUB that failed. The report should show every dc:title entry and whether one title can safely remain.
Upload EPUB to scanFAQ
It can be safe when one title is clearly stale or duplicated. It should not choose between real title variants.
No. This error is inside the EPUB package file, usually content.opf.
Not necessarily. Subtitle and title refinements can be legitimate metadata, so review them before deleting entries.
Publishing validators need one coherent package title so the EPUB metadata is not contradictory.